'delete' keyword
%u
wfunction at hotmail.com
Tue Jan 4 18:37:25 PST 2011
Sorry for the second email, but another idea I forgot to mention is this:
Instead of logging (or even with logging!), allow a debug feature where the
'delete' keyword would walk all of the memory and check for references to the
object before actually deleting it, and if there's a problem, just have it do an
assert(0). This will make debugging a breeze, and it would pretty much clear up
any problems with safety and all.
Does that sound like a good (and reasonably simple) option?
Thank you!
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list