Moving to D
Walter Bright
newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Fri Jan 7 10:54:33 PST 2011
Russel Winder wrote:
>> One thing I would dearly like is to be able to merge branches using meld.
>>
>> http://meld.sourceforge.net/
>
> Why?
Because meld makes it easy to review, selectively merge, and do a bit of editing
all in one go.
> Mercurial, Bazaar and Git all support a variety of three-way merge tools
> including meld, but the whole point of branching and merging is that you
> don't do it manually -- except in Subversion where merging branching
> remains a problem.
But I want to do it manually.
> With Mercurial, Bazaar and Git, if you accept a changeset from a branch
> you jsut merge it, e.g.
>
> git merge some-feature-branch
>
> job done. If you want to amend the changeset before committing to HEAD
> then create a feature branch, merge the incoming changeset to the
> feature branch, work on it till satisfied, merge to HEAD.
>
> The only time I used meld these days is to process merge conflicts, not
> to handle merging per se.
I've always been highly suspicious of the auto-detection of a 3 way merge conflict.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list