Why is the "in" storage class missing from the ParameterStorageClass enum?

[Andrej Mitrovic]

On 1/21/11, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> wrote:
> Umm. in is never the default. in is essentially an alias for const scope.
> The
> default is non-shared and mutable.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis
>

That's what I thought. But I did saw it mentioned in this NG a couple
of times, I can't remember by who though.

In any case, "in" seems to be missing from that enum definition. So
unless there's a specific reason for its absence, I'd file an
enhancement request.