Constructors (starstruck noob from C++)
Andrej Mitrovic
andrej.mitrovich at gmail.com
Fri Jan 21 07:55:11 PST 2011
Theorizing: Would it be a bad idea if .dup for classes did the same
thing as normal assignment did for structs with postblit constructors?
Essentially I was thinking that code like this would do the trick:
import std.stdio;
class Widget
{
int integral; // field-by-field assignment
int[] array; // this needs a postblit
this(uint length)
{
array = new int[length];
}
this(this)
{
array = array.dup;
}
}
void main()
{
auto w1 = new Widget(10);
auto w2 = w1.dup;
assert(w1.array !is w2.array);
}
I like uniformity in a language, it's much easier to get the rules
right this way. But I'm speculating whether this would even work
right..
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list