Showing unittest in documentation (Was Re: std.unittests [updated] for review)
Jens Mueller
jens.k.mueller at gmx.de
Mon Jan 24 09:55:52 PST 2011
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> In case you didn't know, I have a set of unit test helper functions which have
> been being reviewed for possible inclusion in phobos. Here's an update.
>
> Most recent code: http://is.gd/F1OHat
>
> Okay. I took the previous suggestions into consideration and adjusted the code a
> bit more. However, most of the changes are to the documentation (though there
> are some changes to the code). Some of the code duplication was removed, and the
> way that some of the assertPred functions' errors are formatted has been altered
> so that values line up vertically, making them easier to compare. The big change
> is the docs though. There's now a fake version of assertPred at the top with an
> overall description for assertPred followed by the individual versions with as
> little documentation as seemed appropriate while still getting all of the
> necessary information across. A couple of the functions still have irritatingly
> long example sections, but anything less wouldn't get the functionality across.
>
> In any case. Here's the updated code. Review away. Andrei set the vote deadline
> for February 7th, at which point, if it passes majority vote, then it will go
> into Phobos. The number of functions is small enough now (thanks to having
> consolidated most of them into the fantastically versatile assertPred) that it
> looks like it will likely go in std.exception if the vote passes rather than
> becoming a new module. So, the std.unittests title has now become a bit of a
> misnomer, but that's what I've been calling it, so it seemed appropriate to
> continue to label it that way in the thread's title.
I wonder whether there is a nice way to have unittests included in the
documentation but also executed. There are lots of examples in the
module (search for 'Verify Examples').
I like to avoid this duplication. Has anybody an idea how to achieve
this? Often the unittests themselves are a pretty good code
documentation.
Jens
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list