Hot for dmd 64bit

[retard]

Thu, 27 Jan 2011 06:32:58 +0000, dwilson wrote:

> Beside praying and pestering, what can we D non-experts do to help get a
> stable 64-bit dmd available?
> 
> Killer D features are strings, slick built in dynamics arrays, no
> headers files to keep in sync, and the other nice features often praised
> by others.   I'm not sure yet that D is my favorite language, but it's
> in the list of top three.
> 
> Killing D (at least for me) is the limit choices for compiling on 64-bit
> Linux with D2 and preferably Phobos instead of Tango.  My setup, for
> reasons I haven't investigated deeply, can't run 32-bit anything, and I
> do intend to work on huge arrays of data, a few GB in RAM.  As for
> Phobos, it's obviously more Mars-related than "Tango" :)

Didn't Walter say about one year ago that it only takes 1-2 months to 
finish the 64-bit port.