Time for Phobos CTFE-ability unittests...right? RIGHT?

[Jonathan M Davis]

On Tuesday 12 July 2011 22:50:14 Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> I'd like to point out that *normal code* in Phobos is losing
> functionality far too often too, like replace() no longer working
> on immutable strings as of the last release.
> 
> Generalized templates are great, but not at the cost of existing
> functionality!

https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/143

- Jonathan M Davis