possible "solution" for ufcs

[Timon Gehr]

Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> Yes, but I also think if we can make UFCS optional, we give some power
> back to the author of the struct/class.  He can choose not to participate
> in ufcs, and then he can control the API to his type.
>
> Plus, this can be a good interim step!  It works right now!
>
> -Steve

Just realized that actually it doesn't. It does not work across module
boundaries... =/


Timon