Article discussing Go, could well be D

[Adam D. Ruppe]

> Something else that comes to mind are database bindings - native D
> bindings that allow you to use D types and integrate well with
> ranges etc would certainly be preferable to using raw C bindings.

Yes, indeed. I wrapped the C database functions for my own use
to get that kind of stuff. But that's not hard to do.

> As long as not too many macros or custom types are involved and
> getting the D bindings isn't too hard

Meh, it's like ten minutes of cut+paste, less if you give up type
safety and use "in void*" everywhere or only use a fraction of the
lib.