UFCS idea

[Alex_Dovhal]

"Jonathan M Davis" <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> wote:
> Regardless, I see little point in using it for UFCS. If we want to
> specifically mark parameters for it, I think that the suggestion of using
> "this" makes a lot more sense. You wouldn't even have to change the 
> grammar
> (unlike if you used @). You'd just change the semantic phase to treat 
> "this"
> specially as a function parameter and not freak out about it being a 
> keyword.
> Using @ would be a much bigger language change and for no gain whatsoever 
> as
> far as I can see.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis

Thanks, Dmitry Olshansky has already explained why using "this" is fully 
suitable. One thing I personally dislike in UFCS is that it's impossible to 
visually separate it from member call syntax, only by context. But this is 
only personal taste. Sorry for noise.