Is This a Solution For the Const/Rebindable Issue?

[Mehrdad]

== Quote from Steven Schveighoffer (schveiguy at yahoo.com)'s article
> What is the type of s.o?  Hint, it can't be final, because final isn't part of the type.
> What is the type of &s.o?
> If the type of s.o is T (let's say) and the type of &s.o is not T*, then I think we have a problem.
> I just think it doesn't work.  Maybe you can figure out a way it can, but I don't think it can be done
without severe confusing semantics.
> -Steve

Type of s.o: const(Object), like before. Can be reassigned.
Type of &s.o: Pointer to a const(Object)... yeah I think I finally see. x_____x

Gosh, that sucks... thanks for the explanation, I appreciate it. :) I'll see if I can figure out a way
(though I doubt I can, lol)...