safe

[Jesse Phillips]

sclytrack Wrote:

> 
> How safe is "safe D" to run on your computer as if it is a client application.
> 
> Let's say you want something like this.
> 
> 1) The source is compared to the local one on the current disk. If the remote
> version
> is newer the new version is downloaded.
> 
> 2) The source gets compiled and then executed in safe D but with only a subset
> of phobos that can not alter anything permanent on the disk. (as if it is
> a javascript client application).
> 
> Like a replacement for HTML5 and javascript.
> 
> ...or not suitable?
> 
> I'm going to eat now.

SafeD is about memory corruption and not security. You'd have to provide your own system security through a framework and system administration.