Proposal for std.path replacement
Jerry Quinn
jlquinn at optonline.net
Thu Mar 3 10:31:20 PST 2011
Lars T. Kyllingstad Wrote:
> As mentioned in the "std.path.getName(): Screwy by design?" thread, I
> started working on a rewrite of std.path a long time ago, but I got
> sidetracked by other things. The recent discussion got me working on it
> again, and it turned out there wasn't that much left to be done.
>
> So here it is, please comment:
>
> http://kyllingen.net/code/ltk/doc/path.html
> https://github.com/kyllingstad/ltk/blob/master/ltk/path.d
Rather than:
drive() & stripDrive()
extension() & stripExtension()
would it make sense to combine them?
string[2] splitDrive(path)
string[2] splitExtension(path)
Just a thought.
Jerry
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list