std.parallelism: Request for Review [Summary of discussion]

[Russel Winder]

On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 11:27 -0800, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
[ . . . ]
> > Presumably this is a four-state vote:
> > 
> > 	+1 approve
> > 	0 cannot decide
> > 	-1 disapprove
> > 	-- no opinion
> > 
> > Anyone not emailing is deemed to have cast a -- vote all of which are
> > automatically discarded.  Votes such as +100 will presumably be
> > renormalized to +1.
> 
> All you really do is vote whether you want it in Phobos or not. The total number 
> of votes/voters is then taken, and the majority decides. If the majority vote 
> for inclusion, then it's included. If the majority vote for it not to be 
> included, then it's not included. There's no weighting of votes or point system 
> or whatnot.

I think we are saying fundamentally the same thing, but you are keeping
it informal and I have started my Friday night whisky (*) drinking.

I think I have already decided to say +1, but I better not say that in
case it is deemed as trying to influence the electorate ;-)

Have a good weekend!

(*) Definitely not whiskey.

-- 
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel at russel.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20110304/692d36a4/attachment.pgp>