LLVM 3.0 type system changes
Daniel Gibson
metalcaedes at gmail.com
Tue Mar 8 05:08:07 PST 2011
Am 08.03.2011 03:41, schrieb Caligo:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Bernard Helyer <b.helyer at gmail.com
> <mailto:b.helyer at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 20:03:36 +0000, filgood wrote:
>
> > as described here:
> >
> > http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/TypeSystemRewrite.txt
> >
> > Btw, what is the status of the D2 LLVM compiler?
>
> You're probably wondering about LDC2, but I'll chip in with SDC's
> ( https://github.com/bhelyer/SDC ) status here:
>
> On the road to some kind of 0.1, but a lot of work to be done -- it
> should land some time this year, however.
>
> Keeping current with DMD releases, current with LLVM releases.
>
>
>
>
> Do we really need another D compiler that doesn't work?
The more D compilers the better.
Assuming that it won't work is quite insulting IMHO.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list