Why can't structs be derived from?
Bekenn
leaveme at alone.com
Sat Mar 19 03:32:38 PDT 2011
On 3/18/2011 7:09 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "typedef b a;" (or "typedef a = b;")
Regarding syntax, maybe:
typedef A : int;
typedef B : int;
...with semantics as follows:
A a = 5; // ok
B b = a; // error
int i = a; // ok
a = i; // error
a = cast(A)i; // ok
b = cast(B)a; // error
b = cast(B)cast(int)i; // ok
Possibly instead of 'typedef' we should be using a non-C keyword. Heck,
even 'type' works:
type A : int;
...and is more consistent with existing type declarations (we use
'class', 'struct', and 'enum', not 'classdef', 'structdef', and 'enumdef').
Not sure if typedef should work with aggregates; that might just get too
confusing.
Bleh. Now I'm /really/ off-topic...
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list