Library Development: What to finish/flesh out?
Denis Koroskin
2korden at gmail.com
Fri Mar 25 14:59:21 PDT 2011
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 00:26:40 +0300, dsimcha <dsimcha at yahoo.com> wrote:
> On 3/25/2011 3:50 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
>> On Mar 24, 2011, at 1:00 PM, dsimcha wrote:
>>>
>>> BTW, the TempAlloc module also includes a hash table, hash set and AVL
>>> tree that
>>> are specifically optimized for TempAlloc. Should these be included in
>>> the
>>> submission? The disadvantages I see here is that they are less
>>> generally useful
>>> (possibly too high level for druntime) and that they will make the
>>> review take a
>>> heck of a lot longer.
>>
>> Are they necessary for TempAlloc to function? If so, I'd add them but
>> hidden, as I imagine there's more code than you'd want to simply drop
>> in a private block in core.memory. It may be time for core to get a
>> core.internal package for this kind of stuff.
>
> No, they are just data structures built on top of TempAlloc and
> optimized for it.
I'd love to see them, in a separate module probably.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list