[GSOC] more ideas
Kagamin
spam at here.lot
Sat Mar 26 09:02:08 PDT 2011
Daniel Gibson Wrote:
> Am 25.03.2011 07:08, schrieb Kagamin:
> > Jonathan M Davis Wrote:
> >
> >> I wouldn't think that the GPL would be a problem for build tools. It (and
> >> LGPL) _is_ a problem for libraries, but you're not linking with tools or
> >> generally doing anything with their code. You're just using them.
> >
> > Well, if Digital Mars doesn't plan to redistribute them, then ok.
>
> The Linux version of DMD already uses GCC tools for linking.
>
> Why shouldn't Digital Mars redistribute GNU tools for linking? I don't
> think the GPL forbids that, as long as the sources of those binaries are
> available somewhere.
In this case they should be distributed as a separate package (in this case there's no need for redistribution: you can just link to mingw.sf.net directly). Will people be fine that the main dmd package can't link anything, I don't know. Mingw seems to live fine with that.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list