Review of std.net.isemail part 2

[KennyTM~]

On Mar 31, 11 02:22, Simen kjaeraas wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 20:19:36 +0200, Daniel Gibson
> <metalcaedes at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> We desperately need a style guide containing all the things which have
>>> actually been agreed to (and equally importantly, nothing which hasn't).
>>> The simplest thing to do would be to fix up the existing one on the
>>> website which nobody follows.
>>
>>
>> What about http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dstyle.html ?
>
> That document has little to do with actual D code written and included in
> Phobos or elsewhere. We really need a new guide.
>

Is this still the case? The issue has been brought up several times in 
this NG and I thought it should have been fixed.

Except 'Two blank lines separating function bodies' the new Phobos 
modules (just looking at container.d) conform to this style guide quite 
well.