typedef alive and well?

[David Nadlinger]

On 11/3/11 7:44 PM, Brad Roberts wrote:
> While I don't disagree with the larger point, I do feel compelled to
> clarify that it's not dmd or the language that's making most of the
> backwards incompatible changes, it's phobos.

I don't think this is generally true – for template 
metaprogramming-heavy code, DMD changes (regressions/bugfixes subtly 
altering behavior of some of the less-defined areas of the language) 
usually cause me much more of a headache than Phobos does.

David