Type Qualifiers and Wild Cards

[Tobias Pankrath]

Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:

> On 11/9/11 9:58 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote:
>> On 09/11/2011 15:29, deadalnix wrote:
>>> inout isn't reminding in any way of its functionnality. It is more
>>> readable than ##, for sure, but way less than any word from
>>> const/immutable lexical field.
>>
>> inout means transfer the input qualifier to the output, it is
>> descriptive enough.
> 
> Thank you. I was itching to write that but was hoping somebody else would.
> 
> Andrei

it would be a good solution, if in and out didn't exists.

I was _very_ confused, when I first saw inout and thougth it would be
a combination of in and out.

So I think it deserves a prominent place in the documentation next to in and 
out.