Website message overhaul

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2011-11-15 09:25, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 11/14/2011 11:50 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>> What would be necessary for you to call a language multiparadigm?
>
> If using multiple paradigms is reasonably natural and convenient in that
> language.
>
> For example:
>
> C: imperative
> C++: imperative, OOP, metaprogramming
> Java: OOP
> D: imperative, OOP, metaprogramming, functional, assembler, script
>
>
> I've seen metaprogramming in C using the preprocessor. But it ain't
> natural or convenient. It's hideous.

If you would consider at least two paradigms as multiparadigm then I 
would say that a lot of languages are multiparadigm.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg