boost crowd.
Kagamin
spam at here.lot
Tue Nov 29 10:14:08 PST 2011
Paulo Pinto Wrote:
> Kagamin Wrote:
>
> > bearophile Wrote:
> >
> > > And this is positive because?
> >
> > You say it as if it's negative.
>
>
> For me it is negative as what I understood from this discussion is that contrary to what is described in TDPL, D modules are not ready to prime time.
>
> At least at the level Modula-2(3), Ada, Delphi, .Net, among others, offer modules.
And what .net modules provide you that D modules don't? Putting aside that I don't remember anything like D modules in .net. .Net has namespaces, which I prefer more, yes.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list