Yet another "compile-time reflection revisited" proposal

[Alex Rønne Petersen]

On 29-11-2011 23:43, RivenTheMage wrote:
>> Yes, __traits should be replaced by a cleaner design eventually.
>> 'is'-expressions, typeid and std.traits are perfectly fine as they are
>> now and I don't see any reason to make their syntax more complicated.
>
> Before all, why typeid() is named typeID()? The return type is TypeInfo :)

Leftover from C++.

- Alex