The "Web Forum for D" Program is a "no go"?

[Abrahm]

"Adam D. Ruppe" <destructionator at gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:jb73ud$2r1v$1 at digitalmars.com...
> Abrahm Wrote:
>> The OP of that idea wasn't serious enough about it or willing to 
>> champion
>> the cause? Or did everyone decide that it was "a dumb idea"?
>
>
> There's two web forum programs in the works, though I think
> mine is the inferior of the two so I'm probably going to let
> it go.

Read the original thread on the idea. Any "hack" on the idea is just 
that: a hack on the idea. I can up my subtle dialog and relegate posts to 
"posted by script kiddie no. 9", but I don't, because I'm nice. LOL. :P 
(Don't make me teach you things you wish you didn't know. Ignorance is 
bliss, ya know).

Hey, when you're done writing "that program", why don't you invite me 
over and see if I sign up. Oh, did I just change the scope of what you 
understood as the requirements? I don't think you have anything to 
program until things like TOS are addressed. It's a constraint on what 
you build and even on whether there is anything to build at all. Show me 
first, the goals. If it's yet another attempt at exploiting those who are 
inherently "good" (if not naive), well maybe that is not software, but 
politics and reason why balls are bad.

But I digress.