an old topic (pun intended)

Timon Gehr timon.gehr at gmx.ch
Thu Oct 27 04:18:01 PDT 2011


On 10/27/2011 11:34 AM, bearophile wrote:
>> out(result, exprX, exprY) {
>
> If you don't need to use the method result too, then you probably write something like:
>
> out(_, exprX, exprY) {
>
> If the method is void then the _ has no value. Is this possible and good?
>
> Bye,
> bearophile

This is possible, but I don't like it too much (see my other post).


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list