an old topic (pun intended)
Davidson Corry
davidsoncorry at comcast.net
Thu Oct 27 19:46:31 PDT 2011
I want to point out (quick, before someone else does!) that the
lowerings I have suggested for old! elsewhere in this thread are naïve.
In the presence of inheritance, interface contracts, and/or multiple
subtyping, things can get notably trickier.
That said,
1) I don't think it affects the utility of the old!symbol notation, and
2) old! would be useful even if inherited contracts weren't fully
handled. (Much more so if they are, of course.)
-- Davidson
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list