Anonymous function syntax
Walter Bright
newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Fri Sep 23 00:34:02 PDT 2011
On 9/22/2011 11:55 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2011-09-23 08:42, Daniel Murphy wrote:
>> void delegate () foo = { bar(); };
>
> Why can't the compiler do something similar automatically. Then we won't have
> the problem if a lambda returns void or a value.
1. This can get arbitrarily expensive if there are parameters involved (temps
have to be constructed, copied, & destroyed) and those costs will be hidden.
2. At some point, heroic efforts to coerce one type to another will subvert the
point of a type system. After all, if the designer of bar() intended the return
value to be the point, wouldn't such a conversion hide a bug?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list