this(this) must be cheap and O(1)

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 9/24/11 2:40 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> By the way, does this mean that we'll be able to get rid of moveFront and its
> compatriots? - since if I understand correctly, the only reason that the
> moveXXX functions exist for ranges is to deal with the case where copying
> isn't cheap.

Depends on whether we want to support ranges of uncopyable objects.

Andrei