Need 'this' to access 'opCall'? Was I trying to?

[Mehrdad]

On 9/26/2011 10:34 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:13:52 -0400, Mehrdad <wfunction at hotmail.com> 
> wrote:
>
>> On 9/26/2011 9:40 AM, Trass3r wrote:
>>>> Well, it looks like having declared a non-static opCall makes the
>>>> automatically generated constructor for the struct unusable - which 
>>>> may or may not be a bug
>>>
>>> I do think it's a bug. Only a static opCall should interfere with 
>>> the constructor.
>> Yeah I agree -- should I file it as one?
>
> Might want to add this case (as I think it is important, and doesn't 
> yet seem to have an exact duplicate report) to bug 6036.  Looks like 
> Kenji is on the case, and he usually comes up with a pull request :)
>
> -Steve
Done!
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6036