DDMD and such.

[Gor Gyolchanyan]

And a library-compiler would be easier to make too, since interpreting
at run-time is a tedious job and making a compiler programmatically
accessible is much easier.

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Gor Gyolchanyan
<gor.f.gyolchanyan at gmail.com> wrote:
> I was thinking more of a run-time D interpreter as a library solution.
> One of D's features could be the ability to interpret itself at
> run-time as a script of some sort. Having a compiler as a library
> solution would further improve this by generating DLLs from given code
> programmatically and return symbols. This would be even better, then
> java's dynamic class loading.
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:59 PM, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> wrote:
>> On Wednesday, September 28, 2011 23:55:42 Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
>>> Damn! a library lexer and parser of D! I think we'll eventually drop
>>> the "compile-time only" restriction from mixins! :-)
>>
>> How? Code needs to be compiled regardless. Sure, you could process and
>> generate string mixins using them (assuming that they're appropriately CTFE-
>> able), but you still don't get code until you actually compile it.
>>
>> - Jonathan M Davis
>>
>