Anonymous function syntax
    Caligo 
    iteronvexor at gmail.com
       
    Wed Sep 28 19:20:38 PDT 2011
    
    
  
Is there a reason why a new syntax is needed for anonymous function?  Can we
get the current one working and then worry about making things pretty? C++
anonymous function may not be any better, but it works, and that's in an
experimental implementation (GCC 4.6).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20110928/1fe3af69/attachment.html>
    
    
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list