Nested functions should be exempt from sequential visibility rules
Nick Sabalausky
a at a.a
Mon Apr 2 22:38:18 PDT 2012
Regarding this:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=790
I submit that nested functions should be exempt from the usual sequential
visibility rules. (Therefore, mutually recursive nested functions would
become possible.)
Or at the very *least*, this horrific C-like workaround should be possible:
void foo()
{
void b();
void a() {...};
void b() {...};
}
...Flame away! ;)
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list