The new std.process?

[Lars T. Kyllingstad]

On Tuesday, 10 April 2012 at 11:18:53 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Apr 2012 22:48:26 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu 
> <SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org> wrote:
>
>> On 4/9/12 9:38 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>>> "Jonathan M Davis"<jmdavisProg at gmx.com>  wrote in message
>>>> https://github.com/kyllingstad/phobos/tree/new-std-process
>>>>
>>>
>>> Oh yea. *Now* I remember asking the same thing before and 
>>> getting pretty
>>> much the same answer...
>
> I think you must have felt a disturbance in the force.  
> Literally yesterday at around 8:30 am, I finally got around to 
> verifying 2.058 includes the pipe fix (and it does!), so I 
> think we are clear to get this ready for review.  Hopefully by 
> 2.060 (2.059 is out for beta right now).

I must have felt the same disturbance.  I logged in to Trello *by 
coincidence* mere minutes after you had checked this off the 
to-do list, and it's been months since the last time I logged in 
there.


>> Shall we add that to the review queue?
>
> It's on the trello board for phobos reviews, in development.  I 
> need to get in touch with Lars, it's his baby.

Also by coincidence, I decided to drop by the NG, and what do you 
know; a thread about std.process! :)  I agree it's high time to 
get this module ready for review.  Now that you have verified 
that pipes finally work on Windows, what remains is mostly 
cosmetic.  I think I'll have time to work on it this weekend.


> BTW, I can't stress how much I dislike windows D development, 
> especially when I have to use git.  Linux just seems so much 
> easier, that I dread ever having to test D windows stuff.  I 
> suppose if it was my main platform, I wouldn't have to scrap 
> around setting shit up every time I want to test something.

I can't stress enough how happy I was that you offered to do the 
Windows part of the module. ;)

-Lars