dmd's linking order
Sean Kelly
sean at invisibleduck.org
Wed Apr 11 07:59:15 PDT 2012
On Apr 11, 2012, at 1:25 AM, Jacob Carlborg <doob at me.com> wrote:
> Could it happen that the linker arguments need to be placed first sometimes ?
If it's a user-created library then maybe. The general rule on Unix is that dependent objects need to be listed before the object they depend on. I think the linker only does a single pass. Optlink doesn't have this problem--it's way nicer in this regard.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list