Why is complex being deprecated again?

[Mehrdad]

So we're removing it to reduce the number of keywords? ...Why?
Is the keyword-ness of "cdouble" and "ifloat", etc. causing problems for 
people?


"Stewart Gordon"  wrote in message news:jmeevc$o3m$1 at digitalmars.com...

On 15/04/2012 04:10, Mehrdad wrote:
> Why is complex being phased out?
> What happened to all this? http://dlang.org/cppcomplex.html

There was a brief discussion about it back in 2008

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/Replacing_built-in_complex_What_s_this_about_81214.html

My impression was that the plan is to deprecate it once the stuff in 
std.complex is
complete.  std.complex has clearly grown since that discussion, but it still 
needs a pure
imaginary type (and I don't know what else at the moment).

>From what I gathered, the reason is that it's an unnecessary complexity 
(pardon the pun)
in the language that relatively few programmers are going to use.  The only 
thing it
really gains by being built in is complex/imaginary literals.  Even a 
library complex
constructor doesn't need to be as cumbersome as the C++ example code on the 
comparison page.

Though it does seem that complex numbers, quite ironically, aren't really 
that complex a
feature....

Stewart.