D Compiler as a Library

[David Nadlinger]

On Thursday, 19 April 2012 at 10:15:36 UTC, Roman D. Boiko wrote:
> Actually, I prefer Boost only because it is slightly more 
> popular […]

Not to argue about the Boost license being popular in the D 
community, and not that the question would really matter, but 
what leads you to this general conclusion? I couldn't find any 
credible statistics on a quick Google search, but a numer of well 
known projects use the/a MIT license (X, Ruby on Rails, Mono, 
Lua, …).

David