Closed development with Trello?

[Brad Anderson]

On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 9:39 AM, simendsjo <simendsjo at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 17:31:59 +0200, Steven Schveighoffer <
> schveiguy at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>  On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:41:20 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu <
>> SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org**> wrote:
>>
>>  On 4/20/12 4:45 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 20-04-2012 11:11, simendsjo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> D has been following a very open development process.
>>>>> There are public newsgroups, mailinglists, wiki, bugzilla and github.
>>>>> But as I understand, much development discussions (and/or planning?)
>>>>> have been moved to Trello.
>>>>> It doesn't seem to be a way to join in as a spectator (or even search
>>>>> for boards), and it feels like a big step in the wrong direction.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it possible to make the Trello part open too?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The intention was to actually open the boards now, AFAIK.
>>>>
>>>> Andrei?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Opened all boards I own for viewing, voting, and commenting. Note that I
>>> don't own the Phobos review queue board so I could not edit it.
>>>
>>
>> Hm... I created the board, but I added you as an admin.  I see you did
>> actually open it up, so it should be open for people to look at.
>>
>> On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:50:23 -0400, simendsjo <simendsjo at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  Thanks. Still need a link as there isn't a search function at trello.com
>>>
>>
>> huh?  I see a search box up top?  I didn't even know you could do a
>> link...
>>
>> try searching for dlang
>>
>> -Steve
>>
>
> "No results". It seems to only search for boards you are involved in. No
> global search.
>

I found the roadmap:
https://trello.com/board/roadmap/4f15dd5edc12a90c6f172baa

There's a 2.058 board too:
https://trello.com/board/2-058-started-2011-12-13-2751-issues-of-which-25-regressions-18-blocker-45-critical-158-major/4f1b347378e9431a08005917


I use Trello's own development board model (slightly modified) at work and
my bosses and I all seem to like it.  I think it's better than the one
board per version approach as it handles progress on something that doesn't
get completed in time for a release. Take a look at it here:

https://trello.com/board/trello-development/4d5ea62fd76aa1136000000c
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20120420/6821ffb3/attachment-0001.html>