Docs: Section on local variables

[Andrej Mitrovic]

On 4/21/12, Jakob Ovrum <jakobovrum at gmail.com> wrote:
> If a simple, unconditional
> default-initialization was an objectively superior solution,
> nobody would bother implementing control flow graphs.

If x then y.

If warnings were superior then nobody would write shit like this:

#pragma(push)
#pragma warning(disable: 4701)
int x;
#pragma(pop)

Or even better when someone furiously adds a comment:
....
int x = 0;  // silence stupid gcc warning #@!*&%
x = ...

I've seen both of these used in popular C++ codebases.

So, ultimately we can rely on .init in D, and we already do. If
someone missed warnings in D for locals initialized to .init then how
come nobody ever complains about them?