Functional programming in D and some reflexion on the () optionality.
deadalnix
deadalnix at gmail.com
Mon Aug 6 14:30:01 PDT 2012
Le 06/08/2012 22:45, Timon Gehr a écrit :
> It isn't. My point is that there actually is no issue that would
> require some complex solution.
>
Actually, we have a very complex solution with no issue. That is in
itself, an issue, especially when that very complex solution isn't
defined properly anywhere except in dmd's implementation.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list