@property

[José Armando García Sancio]

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 1:52 PM, José Armando García Sancio
<jsancio at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Timon Gehr <timon.gehr at gmx.ch> wrote:
>> On 08/07/2012 08:37 PM, José Armando García Sancio wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Timon Gehr<timon.gehr at gmx.ch>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 08/07/2012 07:59 AM, José Armando García Sancio wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Kapps<opantm2+spam at gmail.com>   wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sunday, 5 August 2012 at 14:32:50 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sunday, 5 August 2012 at 04:12:23 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> Interesting. I can't speak for the GC and allocation you mention since
> I never tried to implement this myself but I should point out that C++
> STL's algorithm "module" (transform, for_each, etc) works this way.
> Having said that, if D can't infer the type of lambda parameters
> (which I thought the current version of D could) and create a
> function/delegate based on the body then this is a no go.
>
> Thanks for you insight.
> -Jose

Just incase it is not clear. I have zero interest in changing or
promoting that we change the signature of the std.algorithm module.
This is more of a selfish module design exercise on my part.

Thanks,
-Jose