finish function for output ranges

[Jonathan M Davis]

On Saturday, August 11, 2012 19:29:53 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> I also wonder whether there exists a better name than
> finish()

finish is what I've used for similar functions in the past. It seems like a fine 
name to me.

> and how to handle cases in which e.g. you finish() an output
> range and then you put more stuff into it, or you finish() a range
> several times, etc.

In all of the cases that I've dealt with where anything like finish is 
required, it's made no sense whatsoever to call finish mulitple times.

> Destroy!

Overall, seems like a sensible idea to me.

- Jonathan M Davis