Unions destructors and GC precision
Simen Kjaeraas
simen.kjaras at gmail.com
Tue Aug 14 22:02:25 PDT 2012
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 22:32:58 +0200, Andrei Alexandrescu
<SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org> wrote:
> On 8/14/12 3:25 PM, bearophile wrote:
>> D2 doesn't give you that restriction, and when an union goes out of
>> scope it calls the destructors of all its fields:
>
> That's pretty surprising. "Major bug" doesn't begin to describe it.
>
> Unions should call no constructors and no destructors.
That means the default case is unsafe. Should it also be an error
(or at least a warning) for a union containing types with destructors
or complex constructors not to have a defined constructor/destructor?
--
Simen
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list