trait for (ddoc)-comments

Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.olsh at gmail.com
Sun Aug 19 07:49:12 PDT 2012


On 19-Aug-12 18:45, David wrote:
> Am 19.08.2012 16:36, schrieb bearophile:
>> David:
>>
>>> Actually, that's why I want that trait :)
>>
>> But in practice, as your command line programs get a little more
>> complex, docopt is not enough, you need normal programming with things
>> like argparse.
>>
>> So maybe a mix of the two ideas is better, to write most stuff in the
>> docstring, and then refine its semantics below with normal code.
>>
>> Bye,
>> bearophile
>
> I am not writing an actual argparsing-library, I thought of starting
> one, but then I realized, I don't have the time to do something amazing
> like argparse, so I decided to go with a less complex and heavily CTFE'd
> version. It looks like that:
>
> struct AppArguments {
>      string username;
>      Alias!("username") u;
>
>      string password;
>      Alias!("password") p;
>
>      bool credentials;
>      Alias!("credentials") c;
>
>      uint width = 1024;
>      uint height = 800;
>
>      string host;
>      Alias!("host") h;
>      ushort port = 25565;
>
>      bool no_snoop = false;
> }
>
> void main() {
>      auto args = get_options!AppArguments();
> }
>
> I added a default --help function to it, if there is no "help" member
> declared in AppArguments, but I realized ... --help without messages is
> kinda pointless ...

What's wrong with std.getopt? I thought there was some movement to 
improve it (including auto-generating usage messages).

-- 
Olshansky Dmitry


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list