Deprecated Library Functions / Methods

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2012-12-02 22:28, Walter Bright wrote:

> For this case (and others like it) I strongly suggest putting the revamp
> in something called std.xml2, and keep std.xml, but let std.xml wither
> and die away of its own accord rather than killing it.

Then we'll be stuck with a stupid name like xml2, just because the 
correct name was already taken by something broken.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg