Deprecated Library Functions / Methods
Jacob Carlborg
doob at me.com
Sun Dec 2 23:44:06 PST 2012
On 2012-12-02 22:28, Walter Bright wrote:
> For this case (and others like it) I strongly suggest putting the revamp
> in something called std.xml2, and keep std.xml, but let std.xml wither
> and die away of its own accord rather than killing it.
Then we'll be stuck with a stupid name like xml2, just because the
correct name was already taken by something broken.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list