Deprecated Library Functions / Methods

Andrei Alexandrescu SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org
Mon Dec 3 07:32:40 PST 2012


On 12/3/12 3:37 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 12/3/2012 6:44 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>> On 2012-12-02 22:28, Walter Bright wrote:
>>
>>> For this case (and others like it) I strongly suggest putting the revamp
>>> in something called std.xml2, and keep std.xml, but let std.xml wither
>>> and die away of its own accord rather than killing it.
>>
>> Then we'll be stuck with a stupid name like xml2, just because the
>> correct name was already taken by something broken.
>
> So call it xmlex like Microsoft does. The exact name isn't that precious.

I'm thinking it would be nice to just define a package xtd that contains 
"new style" std libraries.

Andrei


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list