Experimental Phobos modules?

[deadalnix]

On Wednesday, 5 December 2012 at 22:42:59 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 05, 2012 22:52:09 Alex Rønne Petersen 
> wrote:
>> Separate project? That kind of defeats the entire purpose: 
>> Making the
>> to-be-tested module readily available to everyone...
>
> It makes sense to me to have a separate package in Phobos for 
> stuff that has
> already been reviewed and is planned to be put into Phobos but 
> we want to make
> sure that it's 100% solid before committing to its API 
> permanently. It does
> not make sense to me to other stuff in there. That would be 
> endorsing stuff that
> isn't necessarily even close to a good enough state to go into 
> Phobos. And how
> would you even decide what went in there? I really don't think 
> that any kind
> of incubator project should go into Phobos-proper.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis

That make sense to me. Isn't it what we are talking about here ?