Next focus: PROCESS

[Rob T]

On Thursday, 13 December 2012 at 18:41:47 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> Since each of us may have conflicting ideas about what the 
> final process
> should be, let's adopt the convention that if something on the 
> page is
> not how you understand things should be, you should discuss on 
> the talk
> page before making the change, so that we don't devolve into an 
> edit
> war.
>
>
> T

I was wondering how we'll resolve conflicts, because not everyone 
will agree on everything thats for certain. We don't really have 
a voting system in place, and there's no "benevolent dictator" 
heading the project unless Andrei has appointed himself for 
resolving conflicts, but he's not really participating much at 
this point. We're kinda leaderless and left with no mechanism for 
making the inevitable hard decisions that we'll have to make if 
this effort is to move ahead.

Any ideas?

--rt