Next focus: PROCESS

[deadalnix]

On Thursday, 13 December 2012 at 20:48:30 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> On Thursday, 13 December 2012 at 20:04:50 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky 
> wrote:
>> I think it's good.
>>
>> But personally I'd expect:
>>
>> * master to be what you define as dev, because e.g. GitHub 
>> puts master as default target branch when making pull 
>> requests. Yeah, I know it's their quirk that it's easy to 
>> miss. Still leaving less burden to check the branch label for 
>> both reviewers and pull authors is a net gain.
>>
>> * And what you describe as master (it's a snapshot or a 
>> pre-release to me) to be named e.g. staging.
>>
>> And we can as well drop the dead branch 'dev' then.
>
> That sound also like a good plan to me.

Updated to follow the idea, plus added bunch of process 
description. Feel free to comment in order to refine this.

http://wiki.dlang.org/Release_Process