Moving towards D2 2.061 (and D1 1.076)

[Iain Buclaw]

On 14 December 2012 21:28, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> wrote:
> On Friday, December 14, 2012 09:34:50 PM Timon Gehr wrote:
>> On 12/14/2012 08:42 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>> > On 2012-12-14 01:19, Walter Bright wrote:
>> >> It was the D community that selected the @(attribute) syntax, and the
>> >> overall design was based on extensive public discussion threads here
>> >> about it.
>> >
>> > And you still implemented the [attribute] syntax first.
>>
>> It is my understanding that the public discussion deciding in favour of
>> @(attribute) was started after [attribute] had already been implemented.
>
> Yes. But I believe that pretty much every other discussion on it prior to it
> actually being implemented discussed using parens and not brackets.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis

Wasn't the last discussion on it over a year ago? (Prior to it
actually being implemented).

-- 
Iain Buclaw

*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';